Refined or white sugar, imported upto 31st December 2010 exempted from Customs duty-Customs Tariff Notification No.8     excise exemption notification for Jammu & Kashmir modified-Central Excise Tariff Notification No.1    Air India may lower retirement age to 55 to cut cost    Board of Approval to decide fate of denotification of Essar's Hazira SEZ on 11th February      Revenue's comments on 1st Discussion Paper on GST-click on the link below for details      SC rules service of notice on the assessee under Section  143(2) within the prescribed period of time is a  pre-requisite for  framing   the  block  assessment   under Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961-AIT-2010-43-SC      HC rules assessee is entitled to benefit under Income Tax on delayed payment of PF if the payment is made before the return is filed-AIT-2010-42-HC     Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amount received by the foreign company from the Government of Tamil Nadu under the contract is essentially in the nature of “fees for technical services” within the meaning of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12.4 of DTAA and cannot be regarded as consideration for the sale of designs and drawings-AIT-2010-38-AAR       Authority for Advance Ruling rules payment received by the applicant from VARs (“third party re-sellers”) on account of supplies of software products to the end-customers (from whom the licence fee is collected and appropriated by VAR) does not result in income in the nature of royalty to the applicant and moreover payments received by the applicant cannot be taxed as business profits in India in the absence of permanent establishment as envisaged by Article 7 of the India-Japan Tax Treaty-AIT-2010- 36-AAR    lending or borrowing money between two associated enterprises comes within the ambit of international transaction and whether the same is at arms length price has to be considered-The question of rate of interest on the borrowing loan is an integral part of arms length price redetermination in this context-AIT-2010-37-ITAT     Export and Import of Currency-RBI Circular No.30       HC rules a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable for questioning reopening of the assessment in a case such as this where the preconditions for the exercise of the power have not been fulfilled-recourse to the power under Section 147 cannot be sustained on a mere change of opinion, there being no failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly, all material facts necessary for assessment-AIT-2010-35-HC     Definitive Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Carbon Black used in rubber applications falling under sub heading 2803 00 10, originating in, or exported from, Australia, China PR, Russia and Thailand-Customs Tariff Notification No.6      Tariff Value for import of Brass scrap is 3597 and for poppy seeds 4392-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 10    Adjustment of “Advance Tax in respect of Fringe Benefits” for Assessment Year 2010-11 against “Advance Tax”-Income Tax Circular No.2     CBDT clarifies it is the choice of the assessee whether to file an objection before the Dispute Resolution panel against the draft assessment order or not to exercise this option and file an appeal later before CIT (Appeals) against the assessment order passed by the AO    
Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

NOTIFICATION No. 31/2008-Central Excise

New Delhi, the 10th June, 2008.

                G.S.R.     (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), read with sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 which was  published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 508 (E), dated the 8th July, 1999, namely:-

In the said notification,-

(i) in paragraph 2A,-

(a) after the words, brackets and figure “corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table,”, the words, brackets and figure “when manufactured starting from inputs specified in the corresponding entry in column (5) of the said Table in the same factory,” shall be inserted;

(b) for the Table, the following Table shall be substituted, namely:-

TABLE

S. No.

Chapter of the First Schedule

Description of goods

Rate

Description of inputs for manufacture of goods in column (3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1.

29

All goods

29

Any goods

2.

30

All goods

56

Any goods

3.

33

All goods

56

Any goods

4.

34

All goods

38

Any goods

5.

38

All goods

34

Any goods

6.

39

All goods

26

Any goods

7.

40

Tyres, tubes and flaps

41

Any goods

8.

72 or 73

All goods

39

Any goods, other than iron ore

9.

74

All goods

15

Any goods

10.

76

All goods

36

Any goods

11.

85

Electric motors and generators, electric generating sets and parts thereof

31

Any goods

12.

25

Cement or cement clinker

75

Limestone and gypsum

13.

17 or 35

Modified starch/glucose

75

Maize

14.

18

Cocoa butter or powder

75

Cocoa beans

15.

72 or 73

Iron and steel products

75

Iron ore

16.

Any chapter

Goods other than those mentioned above in S.Nos.1 to 15

36

Any goods

(ii)    In paragraph 2.1, -

(a)           for  sub-paragraph (1),the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“ (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph 2A, the manufacturer shall have the option not to avail the rates specified in the said Table and apply to the Commissioner of Central Excise or the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the manufacturing unit of the manufacturer for fixation of a special rate representing the actual value addition in respect of any goods manufactured and cleared under this notification, if the manufacturer finds that the actual value addition in the production or manufacture of the said goods is at least 115 per cent of the rate specified in the said Table and for the said purpose, the manufacturer may make an application in writing to the Commissioner of Central Excise or the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, not later than the 30th day of September in a financial year for determination of such special rate, stating all relevant facts including the proportion in which the material or components are used in the production or manufacture of goods:

Provided that the Commissioner of Central Excise or the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be,  may, if he is satisfied that the manufacturer was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the aforesaid time, allow such manufacturer to make the application within a further period of thirty days:

Provided further that the manufacturer supports his claim for a special rate with a certificate from his statutory Auditor containing a calculation of value addition in the case of goods for which a claim is made, based on the audited balance sheet of the unit for the preceding financial year:

Provided also that a manufacturer that commences commercial production on or after the 1st day of April, 2008 may file an application in writing to the Commissioner of Central Excise or the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, for the fixation of a special rate not later than the 30th day of September of the financial year subsequent to the year in which it commences production.

(1A) Nothing contained in sub-paragraph (1) shall apply to a unit manufacturing goods falling under Serial Nos. 12, 13, 14 or 15 of the Table.”

(b) in sub-paragraph (2), for the words ”six months”, the words “three months” shall be substituted;

(c) for sub-paragraph (5), the following sub- paragraph shall be substituted, namely:-

“(5) The manufacturer shall be entitled to refund at the special rate fixed under sub-paragraph (2) in respect of all clearances of excisable goods manufactured and cleared under this notification with effect from the 1st day of April of the year in which the application referred to at sub-paragraph (1) was filed with the Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, as the case may be:

                Provided that in cases where the application referred to in sub-paragraph (1) had already been filed prior to the 10th day of June, 2008, the manufacturer shall be entitled to refund at the special rate fixed under sub-paragraph (2) in respect of all clearances of excisable goods manufactured and cleared under this notification with effect from the 1st day of April, 2008.’’

(d) after sub-paragraph (5), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

 “(5A) manufacturer who commences commercial production on or after the 1st day of April, 2008, shall be entitled to refund at the special rate fixed under sub-paragraph (2) against his first application in respect of all clearances of excisable goods manufactured and cleared under this notification with effect from the date of commencement of such commercial production and the difference between the refund payable at such special rate and the actual refund paid to him from the date of commencement of commercial production till the date of fixation of special rate, during the period shall be refunded to him.”

(iii)  after paragraph 2.1, the following shall be inserted, namely:-

 “2.2 (1)In case the total  amount of refund paid or payable to a manufacturer in respect of goods cleared from a unit during a financial year is less than the total duty paid by him on the said goods, other than the amount paid by utilization of CENVAT credit, for the year, the differential amount, if any,  shall be refunded to him subject to the condition that the total refund made to him during the year, including the aforesaid differential amount, does not exceed the total duty payable on value addition whether at the rate specified in the Table or at the special rate fixed under paragraph 2.1.

(2) The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, shall refund the differential amount, if any, to the manufacturer not later than the 15th day of May in the subsequent financial year. “

[F. No. 334/1/2008-TRU]
(Unmesh Wagh)
Under Secretary to the Government of
India.

Note:- The principal notification No. 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 508(E), dated the 8th July, 1999 and was last amended vide notification no. 17/2008-Central  Excise, dated the 27th March, 2008 vide number G.S.R.   222(E), dated the 27th March, 2008.

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments