Sudha Sharma appointed as Member of CBDT    Rupee hits a high of 48.73 against Dollar   Excise Officers caught burning official files in midight in Aligarh after Income Tax raids on Ponty Chadha     SC cancels 122 licences issued by A Raja during his tenure as Telecom Minister    Laxman Das is Officiating Chairman of CBDT    Tariff Value for import of gold is 556 & for silver 1067 & for Brass Scrap 4078 & for poppy seeds 2205-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 10   Fused Silica is classifiable under Tariff Item 32074000-Customs Circular No.3  Additional Commisssioner of Income Tax HA Siddiqui sentenced to 4 years imprisonment for accepting bribe of Rs 1 Lakh by CBI Court in Delhi    Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 50.20 Per US Dollar & Rs 66 per EURO-Exchange Rate for export goods is Rs 49.40 per US Dollar & Rs 64.40 per EURO    HC upholds levy of service tax on booking of flats-The explanation which was inserted by the Finance Act of   2010 clearly brings within the fold of taxable service a construction  service provided by the builder to a buyer where there is an intended sale  between the parties whether before, during or after construction    Authority for Advance Ruling rules super concentrates shall be classified as products of the chemical industry under heading 3824 90 90 of Customs Tariff      Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Morpholine from China European Union & USA     Anti dumping duty imposed on import of  Geogrid/Geostrips/ Geostraps made of polyester or Glass fiber in all its forms from      Refund of Anti­-Dumping Duty (Paid in Excess of Actual Margin of Dumping) Rules, 2012 notified-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.5     Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Amendment Rules, 2012-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.6     Safeguard duty at the rate of 10% ad  valorem notified on import of Phthalic anhydride, falling under tariff item 2917 35 00-Customs SG Notification No.1     Customs duty on import of Gold, Silver, Cut & Polished Diamonds hiked    Customs duty to be charged at the rate of 2 per cent of Tariff Value on gold and 6 per cent of Tariff Value on silver     Tariff Value for import of gold & silver notified-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.3     Anti-dumping duty on imports ofSilk fabrics 20-100 gms per metre, falling under heading 5007  originating in, or exported from, China-CustomsTariff Notification No. 2     Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of Nylon Filament Yarn, falling under Chapter 54 ,originating in, or exported from,  China, Chinese Taipei, Malaysia, Thailand and Korea RP-Customs TariffNotification No.3   Anti-dumping duty imposed on import of Phosphoric Acid of allgrades and all concentrations (excluding Agriculture/Fertilizer Grade) ,falling under tariff item 28092010, originating in, or exported from, Israel and Taiwan-Customs Tariff Notification No.4    Anti-dumping duty on imports of Cellophane Transparent Film , falling under Chapter 39 , originating in, or exported from, China-Customs TariffNotification No.5    Anti-dumping duty onimports of Saccharin, falling under Chapters 29, 30, 33 and 38 ,originating in, or exported from, China-Customs Tariff Notification No.7    Special Bench of ITAT rules the appellant is not entitled to set off carry forward business loss against the long term capital gain arising on sale of land used for the purpose business    ITAT rules Long Term and Short Term gains / losses on sale of equity shares under Portfolio Management Scheme is business income  and not Capital Gains   HC rules the opinion of the AO may have been legally erroneous but this cannot be a ground for initiation of re-assessment proceedings      Anti-dumping duty on ‘Caustic Soda’,  originating in, or exported from, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Japan, USA & France-Customs Tariff Notification No.1    Cost Accountants can issue Certificates for the purpose of refund of 4% CVD-Customs Circular No.1     Customs duty on import from ASEAN nations lowered- Customs Tariff Notification No.127     deeper tariff cut on import from Malaysia notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.128   deeper tariff cuts on import from Korea notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.123  deeper tariff cuts on import from Srilanka & Pakistan under SAFTA notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.125      Schedule of Rates for Service Tax Refund to Exporters notified in supersession of Notification No.17/2009-Service Tax Notification No. 52      Customs duty on import of several products from specified countries lowered-Customs Tariff Notification No.113      Anti-dumping duty on ‘Sodium Hydrosulphite (SHS)’, falling under headings 2831 and 2832 , originating in, or exported from, China PR- Customs Tariff Notification No.111     CBEC specifies documents required for Registration of ServiceTax     Customs duty on import of 532 Products from Singapore lowered-many products exempted from duty-Customs Tariff Notification No. 106     Government allows Rebate of excise duty on export of goods to Nepal under ARE-1 Procedure w.e.f. 1st March 2012-Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.24

Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

FinMin spoils Rebate Party of J&K and North-East on AIT Report

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Acting on the Report of Allindiantaxes ; Finance Ministry has finally spoiled the Rebate Party of Jammu & Kashmir,North-East,Kutch and Sikkim Units by issuing directions to the concerned Officials that the Units working in Excise Free Zones are not entitled to Rebate on export as they are not paying any Central Excise duty but are availing exemption from duty. The officials have also been directed to issue notices to all those Units to whom Rebate claims have been irregularly sanctioned by the Department.

The Government had also taken the Opinion of Law Ministry who opined that the term ‘duty paid’ used in rule 18 of Central Excise Rules does not include that portion of duty, which is subsequently refunded to the manufacturer.  It was also opined that the amount so refunded to the manufacturer is to be treated as an exemption and rebate of the said amount cannot be paid.

The Story reported by Allindiantaxes is as under:

FinMin in Santa Mode: Doles out Rebate when no duty paid: Double Your Money Scam all set to shake North Block

AIT News Network

JAMMU. What may perhaps be another Rs.100 Crore scam going to shock even the mandarins of the Finance Ministry; is grant of Rebate by Maritime Commissioners on goods manufactured in Tax Heaven of Jammu & Kashmir on which no duty is legally paid but the rebate is being illegally claimed on export of these goods.

Though on one hand Hon’ble Finance Minister is leaving no stone unturned for plugging the Revenue leakage, Double Your Money in no time is the new buzzword for manufacturers and exporters.

The modus operandi is simple:

Step 1. Set up a Unit in Jammu & Kashmir and avail the benefit of Central Excise Notification No. 56/2002.

Step2: Pay Rs.10 lakh on goods manufactured and cleared as prescribed under Notification No.56/2002

Step 3: Get Refund of Rs.10 lakh paid as provided under Notification No.56/2002

Step 4: Export the same goods. Get Rebate of another Rs.10 Lakh.

Thus on an investment of Rs.10 Lakh ; the Government is in fact giving a return of Rs.20 Lakh. 

According to sources this incentives without legal backing are being given to some of the manufactures allegedly on the basis of unreported clarification given to the field formations by the Central Board of Excise & Customs.

R.S.Sharma,  Well Known Indirect Tax Expert  told allindiantaxes.com that granting of Rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the goods directly exported from Jammu Units through Merchant Exporters, in addition to the refund granted under the said Notification No.56/2002-CE is illegal as the Notification No. 56/2002-CE is an exemption notification issued under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 granting exemption to the goods manufactured in the specified areas of Jammu region. A suitable mechanism has been incorporated in exemption Notification to operationalize the  exemption  wherein the the manufacturer is first required to pay  the excise duty and thereafter, whatever is paid in cash is to be refunded. In terms of Rule 12 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, there is a special dispensation to the manufacturers to take CENVAT credit of duty paid on the goods bought from the units of Jammu region and used in the manufacture of subsequent final products.  However, there is no such special dispensation for admissibility of rebate under Rule 18.

Under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, effectively no duty is being paid on the goods cleared and in addition, they are getting rebate of duty @ rate of 16% of value of goods which is never paid. 

It has been reportedly learnt that the alleged clarification given by the Board has given indication that payment of duty under the said Notification is also payment of duty for the purpose of granting rebate under Rule 18.  It seems to be incorrect in as much as since Notification No. 56/2002-CE is an exemption Notification under Section 5A i.e. no duty is being paid effectively, grant of rebate under Rule 18 in the absence of special dispensation as in the case of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, is a double benefit resulting into revenue loss in crores of rupees, which needs to be addressed immediately.

In view of above Allindiantaxes.com suggests:

FinMin should give equal opportunities( as guaranteed under Constitution of India)  to all manufacturers exporters to double their money by claiming first Refund and thereafter Rabate of the same amount by issue of a Circular that the Rebate is also admissible in addition to Refund under the said Notification  and Rebate Party is open for all manufacturers exporters  as granting of  rebate in addition to refund in the above manner has resulted in loss of business opportunity  to those manufactures who are not claiming such rebate vis-à-vis manufacturers who have claimed rebates and have offered lower prices of the products to their buyers.

OR

Immediate directions should be issued to stop Rebate Party and to recover the rebate granted erroneously.  Possibility of the same fate for North East units or units in Kutch region cannot be ruled out. But  whether Intelligence Agencies will be able to trace merchant exporters who have availed the Rebate or not; is a big question as their addresses are neither verified at the time of issue of IEC Code nor at the time of grant of Rebate.

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments