Jammu Units face unwarranted excise litigation

Himachal Government hikes VAT from 4 per cent to 5 per cent on all items, except edible oils and foodgrains Authority for Advance Ruling rules no capital gains accrued or arose at the time of conversion of partnership firm into a private limited company under Part IX of the Companies Act and therefore, notwithstanding the non-compliance with clause (d) of proviso to Section 47(xiii) of the Income Tax Act, by reason of premature transfer of shares, the said company is not liable to pay capital gains tax-AIT-2010-93-AAR Authority for Advance Ruling rules if the purchasers are non-residents other than the applicant, the applicant is liable to pay tax in India on the amount received by it for the support services rendered through the branch office in India-AIT-2010-92 -AAR Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Panel-Income Tax Order No.3 Employment of washing process in the manufacture of agglomerates etc from imported plastic waste and scrap-SEZ Instruction No.48 Haryana Government imposes surcharge ranging from 0.25 per cent to 0.7 per cent on VAT Service Tax Notification No. 17/2010 which exempts the taxable service providing packaged or canned software, intended for single use and packed accordingly amended-Service Tax Notification No.18 Procurement, Import and Export of Prohibited and Restricted Goods by SEZ Units-SEZ Instruction No. 47 Tractors are chargeable to tractor cess in terms of the Tractor Cess Rules, 1992 read with the IDRA Act, 1951-Central Excise Circular No. 916 Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amounts received/receivable by Technopromexport from NTPC under contract for Offshore supply of all plant and equipment including mandatory spares are not liable to tax in India under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and DTAA between India and Russia-AIT-2010-79-AAR whether Cess levied under section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is includable as a component of CVD-AIT-2010-78-HC Toilet linen and kitchen linen, of terry toweling or similar terry fabric, of cotton and of other textile materials added in Focus Product Scheme for exports made after 1st Jan 2010-DGFT PN 46 TDS on payment of interest on time deposits under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act by banks following Core-Branch Banking Solutions software-Income Tax Circular No.3 Duty Credit Scrips can also be used / debited towards payment of Customs Duties in case of EO defaults under Authorizations issued under Chapters 4 and 5 of the Policy-DGFT Notification No.32 SC Ruling-the nature of roll over premium charge incurred by the assessee as also the scope and applicability of Section 43A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of such charges-we find no merit in the contention of the assessee that roll over charges have nothing to do with the fluctuation in the rate of exchange-AIT-2010-75-SC Pre-authentication of excise invoices dispensed with Excise duty on Goggles and OTS cans hiked to 10 per cent av gas and mosquito net impregnated with insecticides subjected to 4 per cent excise Outright exemption from additional duty of customs (of 4%) leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to goods imported in a pre-packaged form and intended for retail sale Benefit of allowing Cenvat credit to be reversed on proportionate basis (when common inputs are used for the manufacture of dutiable and exempt products) extended retrospectively Bad News for ladies-sanitary napkins & kids diapers subjected to 10 per cent excise excise duty @ 4% imposed on specified IT products like microprocessor other than motherboards, floppy disc drives, CD-Rom drive etc when these items are meant for external use with a computer or laptop as a plug-in device Packaged software or canned software exempted from excise excise duty on Cartons, boxes and cases, of corrugated paper or paperboard manufactured by Standalone manufacturers lowered from 8% to 4%

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Jammu Units face unwarranted excise litigation

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Central Excise Department of Jammu & Kashmir is denying the refund of Education Cess and SHE Cess to manufacturing Units located in Jammu & Kashmir claiming that Education Cess and SHE Cess are not duties of excise.

Under a special procedure; the manufacturers located in Jammu & Kashmir first pay excise duty and Cess and thereafter claim the refund under Central Excise Tariff Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002.

Even in those cases where the refund of Education Cess has been granted to the manufacturers; the Department has filed appeal in Tribunal. The contention of the department is that the said Notification exempts duty of excise liviable under Central Excise Act, 1944, Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of special importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978). It does not exempt E Cess leviable under section 91 to 93 of Finance Act, 2004 read with clause 81 to 83 of Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2004. The refund granted under the said notification is only operationalization of exemption granted from duty of excise leviable under Central Excise Act, 1944, Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978). Since the said Notification does not provide any exemption for payment of E Cess and SHE Cess, it is apparent that refund of E Cess and SHE Cess, refund of Cess is beyond the scope of exemption granted in the said notification.

According to RS Sharma Advocate, who is handling litigation on behalf of several Jammu based manufacturers in Delhi Bench of CESTAT (Customs Excise & Service Tax Tribunal), the manufacturers are entitled to refund as Education Cess and SHE Cess are also duties of excise. Even Section 93(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 provides as under:

“The Education Cess levied under section 91, in the case of goods specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, being goods manufactured or produced, shall be a duty of excise”

Rajasthan High Court in case of BANSWARA SYNTEX LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA reported by allindiantaxes vide AIT-2007-459–HC also held as under in a similar matter where rebate claim of Cess paid was involved:

“The very fact that the surcharge is collected as part of levy under three different enactments goes to show that scheme of levy of Education Cess was by way of collecting special funds for the purpose of Government project towards providing and financing universalised quality of basic education by enhancing the burden of Central Excise Duty, Customs Duty, and Service Tax by way of charging surcharge to be collected for the purpose of Union. But, it was made clear that in respect of all the three taxes, the surcharge collected along with the tax will bear the same character of respective taxes to which surcharge was appended and was to be governed by the respective enactments under which Education Cess in the form of surcharge is levied & collected.

Apparently, when at the time of collection, surcharge has taken the character of parent levy, whatever may be the object behind it, it becomes subject to the provision relating to the Excise Duty applicable to it in the manner of collecting the same obligation of the tax payer in respect of its discharge as well as exemption concession by way of rebate attached with such levies. This aspect has been made clear by combined reading of sub-sections (1), (2) & (3) of Section 93.

Impugned orders are set aside to the extent the petitioner has been denied the claim to rebate on surcharge on Excise Duty appropriated by Union of India as Education Cess for funding Universalised quality basic education programme but was paid by the petitioner only as Duty of Excise”

Further, in case of Bharat Box Factory Ltd Versus CCE, Jammu AIT-2007-460-CESTAT the issue was decided against the department but the Department has taken a plea that their SLP is pending in Supreme Court.

It is high time that FinMin should issue a clarification the refund of Education Cess and SHE Cess, which are in the nature of piggy back duty on the excise duties under the said Acts, are also required to be refunded, because these were not at all leviable, in view of the entitlement to exemption worked out under Paragraph 2 of the said Notification, will also be admissible so that unwarranted litigation being faced by Jammu units can be avoided. Otherwise there will be almost 5000 appeals in Delhi Bench of CESTAT on this issue as every unit is regularly claiming refund of Education Cess and SHE Cess.

Ø Honeymoon of manufacturers in J & K, Kutch & North-East is Over

Ø Kutch, J & K and North-East Excise changes challenged in High Court

Ø FinMin spoils Rebate Party of J&K and North-East on AIT Report

Ø No Rebate on export of goods manufactured in Excise Free Zones

Ø Honeymoon of manufacturers in Excise Free Zones is over

Ø Job Work for Uttaranchal Himachal Units liable to Excise