Budget to be presented on 16th March    FM issues Advisory to CESTAT to ensure that orders are issued by Benches on conclusion of arguments and in complicated matters orders should be issued within 30 days    Madras High Court stays levy of service tax on lawyers    economic growth slows to 6.9 per cent   Sunil Kumar appointed as Chief Secretary of Chattisgarh    Amarchand Mangaldas to open offices in Chennai Ahmedabad & Pune    US closes its embassy in Syria    Sudha Sharma appointed as Member of CBDT    Rupee hits a high of 48.73 against Dollar   Laxman Das is Officiating Chairman of CBDT    Tariff Value for import of gold is 556 & for silver 1067 & for Brass Scrap 4078 & for poppy seeds 2205-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 10   Fused Silica is classifiable under Tariff Item 32074000-Customs Circular No.3    Additional Commisssioner of Income Tax HA Siddiqui sentenced to 4 years imprisonment for accepting bribe of Rs 1 Lakh by CBI Court in Delhi    HC upholds levy of service tax on booking of flats-The explanation which was inserted by the Finance Act of   2010 clearly brings within the fold of taxable service a construction  service provided by the builder to a buyer where there is an intended sale  between the parties whether before, during or after construction    Authority for Advance Ruling rules super concentrates shall be classified as products of the chemical industry under heading 3824 90 90 of Customs Tariff      Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Morpholine from China European Union & USA     Anti dumping duty imposed on import of  Geogrid/Geostrips/ Geostraps made of polyester or Glass fiber in all its forms from      Refund of Anti­-Dumping Duty (Paid in Excess of Actual Margin of Dumping) Rules, 2012 notified-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.5     Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Amendment Rules, 2012-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.6     Safeguard duty at the rate of 10% ad  valorem notified on import of Phthalic anhydride, falling under tariff item 2917 35 00-Customs SG Notification No.1     Customs duty on import of Gold, Silver, Cut & Polished Diamonds hiked    Customs duty to be charged at the rate of 2 per cent of Tariff Value on gold and 6 per cent of Tariff Value on silver     Tariff Value for import of gold & silver notified-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.3     Anti-dumping duty on imports ofSilk fabrics 20-100 gms per metre, falling under heading 5007  originating in, or exported from, China-CustomsTariff Notification No. 2     Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of Nylon Filament Yarn, falling under Chapter 54 ,originating in, or exported from,  China, Chinese Taipei, Malaysia, Thailand and Korea RP-Customs TariffNotification No.3   Anti-dumping duty imposed on import of Phosphoric Acid of allgrades and all concentrations (excluding Agriculture/Fertilizer Grade) ,falling under tariff item 28092010, originating in, or exported from, Israel and Taiwan-Customs Tariff Notification No.4    Anti-dumping duty on imports of Cellophane Transparent Film , falling under Chapter 39 , originating in, or exported from, China-Customs TariffNotification No.5    Anti-dumping duty onimports of Saccharin, falling under Chapters 29, 30, 33 and 38 ,originating in, or exported from, China-Customs Tariff Notification No.7    Special Bench of ITAT rules the appellant is not entitled to set off carry forward business loss against the long term capital gain arising on sale of land used for the purpose business    ITAT rules Long Term and Short Term gains / losses on sale of equity shares under Portfolio Management Scheme is business income  and not Capital Gains   HC rules the opinion of the AO may have been legally erroneous but this cannot be a ground for initiation of re-assessment proceedings      Anti-dumping duty on ‘Caustic Soda’,  originating in, or exported from, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Japan, USA & France-Customs Tariff Notification No.1    Cost Accountants can issue Certificates for the purpose of refund of 4% CVD-Customs Circular No.1     Customs duty on import from ASEAN nations lowered- Customs Tariff Notification No.127     deeper tariff cut on import from Malaysia notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.128   deeper tariff cuts on import from Korea notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.123  deeper tariff cuts on import from Srilanka & Pakistan under SAFTA notified- Customs Tariff Notification No.125      Schedule of Rates for Service Tax Refund to Exporters notified in supersession of Notification No.17/2009-Service Tax Notification No. 52      Customs duty on import of several products from specified countries lowered-Customs Tariff Notification No.113      Anti-dumping duty on ‘Sodium Hydrosulphite (SHS)’, falling under headings 2831 and 2832 , originating in, or exported from, China PR- Customs Tariff Notification No.111     CBEC specifies documents required for Registration of ServiceTax     Customs duty on import of 532 Products from Singapore lowered-many products exempted from duty-Customs Tariff Notification No. 106     Government allows Rebate of excise duty on export of goods to Nepal under ARE-1 Procedure w.e.f. 1st March 2012-Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.24

Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

Joint Venture is taxable @ 41 per cent as Association of persons: Advance Ruling

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Authority for Advance Rulings vide a recent ruling AIT-2008-260-AAR affecting tax liability of Joint Ventures has ruled that when all the partners of Joint Venture have joined in for common purpose on their own volition to produce income which is shared in certain ratio; the Joint Venture has to be treated as an association of persons (A.O.P.) in consonance with section 2(31)(v) read with the Explanation to section 2 and liable to be assessed as such under the Income-tax Act. The Joint Venture is to be taxed in the status of an association of persons @ 41% net basis.

The applicant, M/s. Geoconsult ZT GMBH ,  a company, incorporated in Austria, having its registered office at Austria, formed a joint venture (in short J.V.) with two Indian companies namely (a) M/s Rites Ltd. India, registered in Delhi and (b)M/s. Secon Pvt. Ltd.India, registered at Bangalore.  This joint venture is specialized in providing project consultancy services. Further, Himachal Pradesh Road and Other Infrastructure Development Corporation  Ltd.(in short HPRIDC) has awarded a contract to the applicant, to provide Consultancy services for Phase I & Phase II for the development of seven tunnels in Shimla as well as in other areas of Himachal Pradesh to carry out the implementation of the aforesaid work. The applicant, as per the averment, renders almost all the services from Austria and in order to coordinate with other members of the joint venture, an engineer has been deputed who undertakes periodical site visits. The applicant states that it has neither a ‘fixed place of business nor an office’ in India. It does not also perform any substantial activities in India.  The employees are also not deputed in India for a considerable length of time.  The applicant, as contended, does not have a ‘permanent establishment’(P.E.) in India within the meaning of Article 5 of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Austria.  The income received by the J.V. for the services performed in connection with the agreement fall within the term ‘fees for technical services’ and is, therefore, subject to tax in India in accordance with Article 12 of the DTAA between India and Austria.

The advance ruling was given on the question as follows:-

(i) Whether, in the factual as well as the legal matrix, the Joint Venture can be treated as an association of persons (A.O.P.) in consonance with section 2(31)(v) read with the Explanation to section 2 of the Act and liable to be assessed as such under the Income-tax Act?

Authority held that the crystallized Judicial view is that the essentials of an association of persons (AOP) are the following :

i) Two or more persons

ii) Voluntary combinations

iii) A common purpose or common action with object to produce profit or gains¹. However, the object to produce profit or gain is no longer a sine qua non with the insertion of the Explanation as discussed above.

iv) Combination in Joint Enterprise

v) Some kind of scheme for common management

All the partners of J.V. have joined in for common purpose on their own volition to produce income which is shared in certain ratio. The applicant’s plea that the payments from the client get credited in the respective Bank accounts of the J.V. members will not be of much help to the applicant, because it is the J.V. which earns the income in the wake of contract. 

The J.V. constitutes an ‘association of persons’ in consonance with section 2(31)(v) read with Explanation thereto.  The J.V. is to be taxed in the status of an association of persons @ 41% net basis. 

( Click here for full text of Ruling AIT-2008-260-AAR )

Related News:

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments