Referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield (S) Pte Ltd not taxable in India

Authority for Advance Ruling rules no capital gains accrued or arose at the time of conversion of partnership firm into a private limited company under Part IX of the Companies Act and therefore, notwithstanding the non-compliance with clause (d) of proviso to Section 47(xiii) of the Income Tax Act, by reason of premature transfer of shares, the said company is not liable to pay capital gains tax-AIT-2010-93-AAR Authority for Advance Ruling rules if the purchasers are non-residents other than the applicant, the applicant is liable to pay tax in India on the amount received by it for the support services rendered through the branch office in India-AIT-2010-92 -AAR Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Panel-Income Tax Order No.3 Employment of washing process in the manufacture of agglomerates etc from imported plastic waste and scrap-SEZ Instruction No.48 Haryana Government imposes surcharge ranging from 0.25 per cent to 0.7 per cent on VAT Service Tax Notification No. 17/2010 which exempts the taxable service providing packaged or canned software, intended for single use and packed accordingly amended-Service Tax Notification No.18 Procurement, Import and Export of Prohibited and Restricted Goods by SEZ Units-SEZ Instruction No. 47 Tractors are chargeable to tractor cess in terms of the Tractor Cess Rules, 1992 read with the IDRA Act, 1951-Central Excise Circular No. 916 Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amounts received/receivable by Technopromexport from NTPC under contract for Offshore supply of all plant and equipment including mandatory spares are not liable to tax in India under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and DTAA between India and Russia-AIT-2010-79-AAR whether Cess levied under section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is includable as a component of CVD-AIT-2010-78-HC Toilet linen and kitchen linen, of terry toweling or similar terry fabric, of cotton and of other textile materials added in Focus Product Scheme for exports made after 1st Jan 2010-DGFT PN 46 TDS on payment of interest on time deposits under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act by banks following Core-Branch Banking Solutions software-Income Tax Circular No.3 Duty Credit Scrips can also be used / debited towards payment of Customs Duties in case of EO defaults under Authorizations issued under Chapters 4 and 5 of the Policy-DGFT Notification No.32 SC Ruling-the nature of roll over premium charge incurred by the assessee as also the scope and applicability of Section 43A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of such charges-we find no merit in the contention of the assessee that roll over charges have nothing to do with the fluctuation in the rate of exchange-AIT-2010-75-SC Pre-authentication of excise invoices dispensed with Excise duty on Goggles and OTS cans hiked to 10 per cent av gas and mosquito net impregnated with insecticides subjected to 4 per cent excise Outright exemption from additional duty of customs (of 4%) leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to goods imported in a pre-packaged form and intended for retail sale Benefit of allowing Cenvat credit to be reversed on proportionate basis (when common inputs are used for the manufacture of dutiable and exempt products) extended retrospectively Bad News for ladies-sanitary napkins & kids diapers subjected to 10 per cent excise excise duty @ 4% imposed on specified IT products like microprocessor other than motherboards, floppy disc drives, CD-Rom drive etc when these items are meant for external use with a computer or laptop as a plug-in device Packaged software or canned software exempted from excise excise duty on Cartons, boxes and cases, of corrugated paper or paperboard manufactured by Standalone manufacturers lowered from 8% to 4%

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield (S) Pte Ltd not taxable in India

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Authority for Advance Rulings(Income Tax) vide a significant ruling AIT-2008-216-AAR has ruled that the referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield, (S) Pte. Ltd. from Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd., in terms of the referral agreement dated January 1, 2005 would not be taxable in India having regard to the provisions of the Income Tax Act and the provisions of the DTAA between India and Singapore either under the head business income, or royalty income or income by way of FTS.

Further, the referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield(S) Pte. Ltd., from Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd. in terms of the referral agreement dated January 1, 2005 is not liable for deduction of tax at source in the hands of the payer.

The applicant does not have a ‘business connection’ in India under the provisions of the Act.

The applicant does not have a Permanent Establishment in India in having regard to the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore by virtue of its agreement with Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd.

The applicant, a foreign company incorporated and based in Singapore, offers a full range of real estate services to its local and international clients. Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd.(in short, CWI) is, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cushman & Wakefield Mauritius, which, in turn, is a subsidiary of Cushman & Wakefield, Asia. The applicant is, as per averment, engaged in the business of rendering services in connection with acquisition, sales and dealings in real estate and other services such as advisory & research facilities management, project management etc. in the field of real estate. The applicant states that it has also developed certain international client relationships and in accordance with the global policy, various offices provide referral services to other Cushman and Wakefield (C&W) offices, wherein one C&W Office would refer client to other C&W office, depending on the requirements of the clients. In respect of such referrals, as per the applicant, each serving C&W Company is liable to pay a ‘referral fee’ to referring group company in accordance with the international fees sharing rules of C&W group. In consonance with this very general policy, the applicant entered into an agreement dated 1st January, 2005 with CWI, as per which, the applicant CWS shall refer/recommend the potential customers, desirous of obtaining real estate consultancy and associated services in India, to CWI. As per the terms of the agreement, CWI will pay the applicant a percentage of amount charged by the applicant (CWS) on the referred customers as referral commission after it (CWI) has realized in full the amount from the customers. Further, withholding of tax on the referral commission paid, has to be deducted by CWI. As mentioned in the statement of facts, the applicant is neither involved in persuading the customers to avail services of CWI, nor in negotiating or collecting fees charged by CWI from the customers referred to by CWS. It has further been stated that they (CWS) simply refer the potential customers for real estate transactions and give some details (locations etc.) about the property in question.

The applicant sought rulings from the Authority on the following questions :-

i. Whether the referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield, (S) Pte. Ltd. (the applicant) from Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd., in terms of the referral agreement dated January 1, 2005 is liable to be taxed in India in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) read with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore?

ii. Whether the referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield(S) Pte. Ltd., from Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd. in terms of the referral agreement dated January 1, 2005 is liable for deduction of tax at source in the hands of the payer?

iii. Whether the applicant can be said to have a business connection in India under the provisions of section 9(1)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act (‘Act’) by virtue of its agreement with Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd.?

iv. If the answer to question (iii) above is in the affirmative, whether the whole or any part (if yes what proportion) of referral fee could be attributed to India in terms of explanation to Section 9(1)(i) of the Act and would constitute income accruing or arising in India?

v. If the referral fee is held to be taxable, whether the same can be classified as Royalty under section 9(1)(vi), fee for technical services under section 9(1)(vii), or “income from business or profession” under the Act read with the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore and what is the rate of tax applicable?

vi. Whether the applicant can be said to have a Permanent Establishment in India in having regard to the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore by virtue of its agreement with Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd.?

vii. If the answer to 6 above is in affirmative, whether the whole or any part thereof (if so what part) can be attributed to the Permanent Establishment?

(Click here for full text of Ruling AIT-2008-216-AAR )