No tax on the examination fees collected for non-resident

PM says India will use fiscal, monetary, public investment and exchange rate measures to tackle global financial meltdown crisis-no effort would be spared to "neutralise" to the "maximum" its adverse impact on India Sensex Up by 500 Points in intra day trading as bargain hunters enter the market Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Acrylic Fibre from Korea RP & Thailand-Customs Tariff Notification No.123 Singer Michael Jackson converts to Islam and changes his name to Mikaeel Debit of advance authorization/DFIA based on balance CIF value of inputs in freely convertible currency-DGFT Circular No.41 Export of edible oils permitted in branded consumer packs of up to 5 Kgs, subject to a limit of 10,000 tons during the next one year up to 31st October, 2009- Export of fish oil allowed freely-DGFT Notification No.60 DTAA between India and Tajikistan signed Authority for Advance Rulings rules the tax payable on the long term capital gains arising on sale of equity shares of Foseco India Ltd., being listed securities, will be 10 per cent of the amount of capital gains as per the proviso to section 112(1) of the Income-tax Act-While calculating the amount of long term capital gain chargeable to tax interest paid by the applicant to the shareholders of Foseco India Limited as per the directives of the SEBI will also be treated as a part of the cost of acquisition of the shares-AIT-2008-416-AAR Authority for Advance Rulings rules the income derived by the applicant on the purchase in India and export of gold jewellery accrues or arises in India and is taxable in India-AIT-2008-417-AAR Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 74.03 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 51.22 Per 100 Yen-Exchange Rate for export is Rs 72.45 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 49.94 Per 100 Yen-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.128 100 per cent EOUs allowed to export non-basmati rice-DGFT Notification No.59 Customs duty of 5 per cent imposed on import of Pig Iron, spiegeleisen, semi-finished products, flat products & long products Import of Crude Soyabean Oil subjected to 20 per cent customs duty- no change in import duty on refined soyabean oil-Customs Tariff Notification No.122 Time-limit for filing refund of service tax extended to 6 months-Service Tax Notification No.32 Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3525 and for poppy seeds 5206-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 127 CBEC clarifies the entire amount of duty paid by the manufacturer, as shown in the invoice would be available as credit irrespective of the fact that subsequent to clearance of the goods, the price is reduced by way of discount or otherwise-Central Excise Circular No.877 SC Ruling-the entitlement of benefit in terms of Section 32AB, Section 80HH and Section 80I of the Income Tax Act- conversion of Jumbo rolls of photographic films into small flats and rolls in the desired sizes amounted to manufacture/production-AIT-2008-413-SC SC Ruling-Whether any "gift" arose in terms of Section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 on the allotment of rights issue by the appellant company to its shareholders vide Board's Resolution- Whether there was any element of "gift" as defined under Section 2(xii) in the appellant issuing Bonus shares in the ratio of 1:23-AIT-2008-412-SC HC Ruling-Income Tax-"reserves" arising out of the acquisition of the business of Tata Cellular Limited could never have the character of "income" in the hands of the petitioners-pre-requisite condition contained in proviso to section 147 to enable the re-assessment to be opened after period of 4 years have elapsed have not been met-AIT-2008-410-HC HC Ruling-Central Excise- valuation of the goods for the purpose of excise duty and whether excise duty was chargeable under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act 1944-while construing rule 3, who are excluded are only the institutional or industrial consumers as explained in Rule 2A and the industrial or institutional consumers in terms of the proviso to rule 2(p) for the purpose of chapter-II are the same-If the person who purchase the prepacked commodity not directly from the manufacturer or packers, they are consumers and the declaration will be of no effect-AIT-2008-408-HC Government considering imposition of import duty on steel Bad News for Consulting Engineers- whether turnkey contract can be vivisected?- The conclusion in Daelim case on the point, prima facie, being not in accordance with law, matter goes to Larger Bench-AIT-2008-405-CESTAT Larger Bench of CESTAT rules Credit is admissible on an input service relating to the business-AIT-2008-407-CESTAT credit of the service tax paid on the outdoor catering (canteen) service is admissible as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-AIT-2008-406-CESTAT The payment for use of "services for MTNL/other companies via the interconnect/port/access/toll by the assessee would not fall within the purview of payments as provided for under section 194J of the Act, so as to be eligible for tax deduction at source-The interconnect charges/port access charges cannot be regarded as fees for technical services-AIT-2008-404-HC Computation of Value under Section 14 for Levy of Export Duty - Customs Circular No. 18 Export duty of 8 per cent notified in place of earlier rate of Rs. 200 per tonne on export of iron ore fines-Customs Tariff Notification No.121 service tax paid under Section 66A is available as 'input credit' under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided the said services are used as input services by the manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of output taxable service-Service Tax Trade Notice No.43/2008

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

No tax on the examination fees collected for non-resident

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Authority for Advance Rulings(Income-Tax) vide AIT-2008-152-AAR has ruled that the examination fee collected by the applicant on behalf of two professional organizations in USA, namely, APICS and AST&L and remitted to those two organizations is not to be treated as the ‘income’ of the said entities liable to be taxed in India. The applicant is not required to either deduct any income-tax or to pay any such tax on the examination fees collected by it for APICS and AST&L and remitted to them as the same is not taxable in India.

M/s KnoWerX Education (India) Private Limited, is engaged in promoting professional examinations/certification programmes of foreign institutes, societies, professional bodies, etc., of international repute, which do not have any establishment of their own in India. In the course of this activity, the applicant has signed an agreement with the American Production and Inventory Control Society, Inc. (APICS) which is a non-profit making body, and offers three certification programmes, namely, CPIM, CIRM and CSCP. The applicant is in the process of signing another agreement with the American Society of Transportation and Logistics Inc. (AST&L) which is also a non-profit making body and offers its own certification programme known as CTL programme. Apart from this, the applicant carries on other activities as well, such as, corporate training, open public training, management consultancy, publishing and trading in educational material, etc. So far as promotion of professional examination/certification programmes of foreign entities is concerned, the applicant will act as their agent; it will collect registration forms and fees from the individuals in India, who wish to register themselves for the examination; and pass them on to the foreign entity after deducting its administrative cost and commission. The foreign entity will conduct examinations either through the applicant or through other entities in India. The evaluation of answer sheets and award of certificates will be done by those foreign entities and they will send certificates to the applicant for local distribution to the successful candidates. In the light of above mentioned facts, the applicant sought advance ruling of this Authority in respect of APICS and AST&L on the following questions:-

Q.1 a) Whether the examination fee collected by the applicant on behalf of two professional organizations in USA, namely, APICS and AST&L and remitted to those two organizations is liable to be treated as the ‘income’ of the said entities liable to be taxed in India?

b) If the answer is in affirmative, how that income has to be classified – such as business income, income from royalty, technical services?

Q.2 Whether the applicant has a legal obligation to deduct tax at source in relation thereto under the relevant provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 and if so at what rate?

Authority observed that the applicant is not a part of APICS. It does not conclude any contracts on behalf of APICS. The acceptance of candidature of an individual for a certification examination is solely done by APICS. The applicant does not maintain stock of goods or merchandise belonging to APICS, it does not secure orders wholly or almost wholly for APICS and it does not in any way bind APICS in the conduct of latter’s examination programme in India. Similar will be the position in respect of AST&L. The applicant thus cannot be regarded as a dependent agent of APICS or AST&L under paragraph 4 of article 5. It is seen that the applicant enjoys an independent status. As stated by the applicant, there is no financial, managerial or any other type of participation between it and APICS. It carries on a variety of activities as noted above, besides promoting examinations of APICS and AST&L. So far as promotion of examination is concerned, it has engaged itself into business relationship with APICS, is in the process of forging such relationship with AST&L, and is open to having such relationship with other foreign entities. Thus, in respect of this activity too, the applicant is not wholly or substantially devoted to APICS and AST&L only. The applicant appears to carry on the work of examination promoter in the ordinary course of its business. The applicant is not subject to any control of APICS with regard to the manner in which it shall carry out its activities with regard to promotion of the certificate examination. We are thus of the view that in terms of paragraph 5 of article 5 the applicant cannot be deemed to be a permanent establishment of APICS and /or AST&L in India.

(Click here for Full Text of Ruling)

Related News :