Service Tax Demands of Rs 30,000 Crores to be issued to Builders

Sensex Up by 500 Points in intra day trading as bargain hunters enter the market Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Acrylic Fibre from Korea RP & Thailand-Customs Tariff Notification No.123 Singer Michael Jackson converts to Islam and changes his name to Mikaeel Debit of advance authorization/DFIA based on balance CIF value of inputs in freely convertible currency-DGFT Circular No.41 Export of edible oils permitted in branded consumer packs of up to 5 Kgs, subject to a limit of 10,000 tons during the next one year up to 31st October, 2009- Export of fish oil allowed freely-DGFT Notification No.60 DTAA between India and Tajikistan signed Authority for Advance Rulings rules the tax payable on the long term capital gains arising on sale of equity shares of Foseco India Ltd., being listed securities, will be 10 per cent of the amount of capital gains as per the proviso to section 112(1) of the Income-tax Act-While calculating the amount of long term capital gain chargeable to tax interest paid by the applicant to the shareholders of Foseco India Limited as per the directives of the SEBI will also be treated as a part of the cost of acquisition of the shares-AIT-2008-416-AAR Authority for Advance Rulings rules the income derived by the applicant on the purchase in India and export of gold jewellery accrues or arises in India and is taxable in India-AIT-2008-417-AAR Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 74.03 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 51.22 Per 100 Yen-Exchange Rate for export is Rs 72.45 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 49.94 Per 100 Yen-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.128 100 per cent EOUs allowed to export non-basmati rice-DGFT Notification No.59 Customs duty of 5 per cent imposed on import of Pig Iron, spiegeleisen, semi-finished products, flat products & long products Import of Crude Soyabean Oil subjected to 20 per cent customs duty- no change in import duty on refined soyabean oil-Customs Tariff Notification No.122 Time-limit for filing refund of service tax extended to 6 months-Service Tax Notification No.32 Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3525 and for poppy seeds 5206-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 127 CBEC clarifies the entire amount of duty paid by the manufacturer, as shown in the invoice would be available as credit irrespective of the fact that subsequent to clearance of the goods, the price is reduced by way of discount or otherwise-Central Excise Circular No.877 Mandavariya (Kishangarh), District Ajmer notified for Unloading of imported goods and loading of export goods-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.117 SC Ruling-the entitlement of benefit in terms of Section 32AB, Section 80HH and Section 80I of the Income Tax Act- conversion of Jumbo rolls of photographic films into small flats and rolls in the desired sizes amounted to manufacture/production-AIT-2008-413-SC SC Ruling-Whether any "gift" arose in terms of Section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 on the allotment of rights issue by the appellant company to its shareholders vide Board's Resolution- Whether there was any element of "gift" as defined under Section 2(xii) in the appellant issuing Bonus shares in the ratio of 1:23-AIT-2008-412-SC HC Ruling-Income Tax-"reserves" arising out of the acquisition of the business of Tata Cellular Limited could never have the character of "income" in the hands of the petitioners-pre-requisite condition contained in proviso to section 147 to enable the re-assessment to be opened after period of 4 years have elapsed have not been met-AIT-2008-410-HC HC Ruling-Central Excise- valuation of the goods for the purpose of excise duty and whether excise duty was chargeable under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act 1944-while construing rule 3, who are excluded are only the institutional or industrial consumers as explained in Rule 2A and the industrial or institutional consumers in terms of the proviso to rule 2(p) for the purpose of chapter-II are the same-If the person who purchase the prepacked commodity not directly from the manufacturer or packers, they are consumers and the declaration will be of no effect-AIT-2008-408-HC Government considering imposition of import duty on steel Bad News for Consulting Engineers- whether turnkey contract can be vivisected?- The conclusion in Daelim case on the point, prima facie, being not in accordance with law, matter goes to Larger Bench-AIT-2008-405-CESTAT Larger Bench of CESTAT rules Credit is admissible on an input service relating to the business-AIT-2008-407-CESTAT credit of the service tax paid on the outdoor catering (canteen) service is admissible as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-AIT-2008-406-CESTAT The payment for use of "services for MTNL/other companies via the interconnect/port/access/toll by the assessee would not fall within the purview of payments as provided for under section 194J of the Act, so as to be eligible for tax deduction at source-The interconnect charges/port access charges cannot be regarded as fees for technical services-AIT-2008-404-HC Computation of Value under Section 14 for Levy of Export Duty - Customs Circular No. 18 Export duty of 8 per cent notified in place of earlier rate of Rs. 200 per tonne on export of iron ore fines-Customs Tariff Notification No.121 Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination And Collection of Duty) Second Amendment Rules, 2008-Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.45 service tax paid under Section 66A is available as 'input credit' under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided the said services are used as input services by the manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of output taxable service-Service Tax Trade Notice No.43/2008

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Service Tax Demands of Rs 30,000 Crores to be issued to Builders

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Builders and Real Estate Developers who have not been paying service tax under notified taxable service of “construction of residential complex” are in for big trouble and are shortly going to be slapped service tax demands in the range of Rs 30000 Crore after the issue has been settled by High Power Authority for Advance Rulings. Top Builders have already been issued notices by service tax department calling for the figures so that the service tax liability may be worked out based on such figures. Since the service tax on construction of residential complex was levied with effect from June 2005; the liability of Builders to pay service tax is also from the date of levy.

The landmark ruling AIT-2008-127-AAR has been given Justice PV Reddy Chairman of the Authority for Advance Rulings. Justice Reddy is ex-Justice of Supreme Court of India and ex-Chief Justice of High Court.

According to the ruling an Agreement for sale of a constructed residential unit is liable to service tax when booking of the unit is done before or during the construction activity. The applicant had submitted a draft agreement before the Authority wherein the payment terms were as under:

“AGREEMENT OF BOOKING/SALE OF RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE SELF-DEVELOPED HOUSING PROJECT-----

3. The BOOKER has agreed to pay/deposit to the BUILDER/PROMOTER OR DEVELOPER the sum of Rs. __________ (Rupees __________ only) against the said constructed residential unit . (hereinafter referred to as "THE CONTRACT AMOUNT"). Such amount shall be paid/deposited by the BOOKER to the BUILDER/PROMOTER OR DEVELOPER as follows: -

Rs. __________ (Rupees __________ only) paid as commitment to purchase the said residential unit.

(ii) Rs. ________________ on--- (iii) Rs. ________________ on---

(iv) Rs. ________________ (v) Rs. ________________

(vi) Rs. ________________ (vii) Rs. ________________

(viii) Rs. ________________ (ix) Rs. ________________

(x) Rs. ________________ (xi) Rs. ________________

(xii) Rs. ________________ (xiii) Rs. ________________

(Against Possession)”

Thus in above situation the payment is not at all linked to stages of construction but even then there is liability to pay service tax.

Though the Ruling has no revenue impact on the applicant as he can recover service tax from his customers as it is his proposed activity; the Developers who have already sold the flats cannot recover service tax from their customers and will be required to pay service tax from their own pocket. Several Consultants who advised their clients against payment of service tax have already reversed their opinion and have now asked them to pay service tax to avoid liability.

Some Consultants who have no exposure and experience of litigation before Supreme Court and Authority for Advance Ruling are criticizing the Applicant. They are more worried about their opinion going wrong and if the logic of the ruling is applied by the Department; the demands will also be confirmed. Such Consultants, whose job is confined to only giving opinion and burying the issues below the carpet, are much more worried about their clients going in the hands of Advocates who will handle the matters up to Supreme Court as the litigation in such matter will obviously go up to Supreme Court.

Related News: