Sensex Up by 500 Points in intra day trading as bargain hunters enter the market     Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Acrylic Fibre from Korea RP & Thailand-Customs Tariff Notification No.123      Singer Michael Jackson converts to Islam and changes his name to Mikaeel     Debit of advance authorization/DFIA based on balance CIF value of inputs in freely convertible currency-DGFT Circular No.41      Export of edible oils permitted in branded consumer packs of up to 5 Kgs, subject to a limit of 10,000 tons during the next one year up to 31st October, 2009- Export of fish oil allowed freely-DGFT Notification No.60     DTAA between India and Tajikistan signed     Authority for Advance Rulings rules the tax payable on the long term capital gains arising on sale of equity shares of Foseco India Ltd., being listed securities, will be 10 per cent of the amount of capital gains as per the proviso to section 112(1) of the Income-tax Act-While calculating the amount of long term capital gain chargeable to tax interest paid by the applicant to the shareholders of Foseco India Limited as per the directives of the SEBI will also be treated as a part of the cost of acquisition of the shares-AIT-2008-416-AAR   Authority for Advance Rulings rules the income derived by the applicant on the purchase in India and export of gold jewellery accrues or arises in India and is taxable in India-AIT-2008-417-AAR Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 74.03 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 51.22 Per 100 Yen-Exchange Rate for export is Rs 72.45 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 49.94 Per 100 Yen-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.128      100 per cent EOUs allowed to export non-basmati rice-DGFT Notification No.59      Customs duty of 5 per cent imposed on import of Pig Iron, spiegeleisen, semi-finished products, flat products & long products    Import of Crude Soyabean Oil subjected to 20 per cent customs duty- no change in import duty on refined soyabean oil-Customs Tariff Notification No.122    Time-limit for filing refund of service tax extended to 6 months-Service Tax Notification No.32        Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3525 and for poppy seeds 5206-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 127     CBEC clarifies the entire amount of duty paid by the manufacturer, as shown in the invoice would be available as credit irrespective of the fact that subsequent to clearance of the goods, the price is reduced by way of discount or otherwise-Central Excise Circular No.877      Mandavariya (Kishangarh), District Ajmer notified for Unloading of imported goods and loading of export goods-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.117    SC Ruling-the entitlement of benefit in terms of Section 32AB, Section 80HH and Section 80I of the Income Tax Act- conversion of Jumbo rolls of photographic films into small flats and rolls in the desired sizes amounted to manufacture/production-AIT-2008-413-SC   SC Ruling-Whether any "gift" arose in terms of Section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 on the allotment of rights issue by the appellant company to its shareholders vide Board's Resolution- Whether there was any element of "gift" as defined under Section 2(xii) in the appellant issuing Bonus shares in the ratio of 1:23-AIT-2008-412-SC    HC Ruling-Income Tax-"reserves" arising out of the acquisition of the business of Tata Cellular Limited could never have the character of "income" in the hands of the petitioners-pre-requisite condition contained in proviso to section 147 to enable the re-assessment to be opened after period of 4 years have elapsed have not been met-AIT-2008-410-HC    HC Ruling-Central Excise- valuation of the goods for the purpose of excise duty and whether excise duty was chargeable under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act 1944-while construing rule 3, who are excluded are only the institutional or industrial consumers as explained in Rule 2A and the industrial or institutional consumers in terms of the proviso to rule 2(p) for the purpose of chapter-II are the same-If the person who purchase the prepacked commodity not directly from the manufacturer or packers, they are consumers and the declaration will be of no effect-AIT-2008-408-HC   Government considering imposition of import duty on steel      Bad News for Consulting Engineers- whether turnkey contract can be vivisected?- The conclusion in Daelim case on the point, prima facie, being not in accordance with law, matter goes to Larger Bench-AIT-2008-405-CESTAT  Larger Bench of CESTAT rules Credit is admissible on an input service relating to the business-AIT-2008-407-CESTAT   credit of the service tax paid on the outdoor catering (canteen) service is admissible as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-AIT-2008-406-CESTAT   The payment for use of "services for MTNL/other companies via the interconnect/port/access/toll by the assessee would not fall within the purview of payments as provided for under section 194J of the Act, so as to be eligible for tax deduction at source-The interconnect charges/port access charges cannot be regarded as fees for technical services-AIT-2008-404-HC   Computation of Value under Section 14 for Levy of Export Duty - Customs Circular No. 18          Export duty of 8 per cent notified in place of earlier rate of Rs. 200 per tonne on export of iron ore fines-Customs Tariff Notification No.121    Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination And Collection of Duty) Second Amendment Rules, 2008-Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.45   service tax paid under Section 66A is available as 'input credit' under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided the said services are used as input services by the manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of output taxable service-Service Tax Trade Notice No.43/2008 
Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

ADVANCE RULINGS 2008

AIT-2008-36-AAR
Accel Frontline Limited Vs CC, Chennai

(a) "What will be the classification and rates of import duties under the relevant Customs Tariff for the data recovered and re-imported in different media."
(b)  "What will be the assessable value as per section 14 of Customs Act 1962 for the goods exported from India for recovery of data and re-imported after recovery of the data." 

AIT-2008-38-AAR
M/s One Stop Airline Vs CC, (I&G), Delhi

Setting up engine MRO Shop for servicing the aircrafts of Indian airlines operating scheduled air transport service/air cargo service

AIT-2008-79-AAR
McLeod Russel India Ltd Vs CIT, Kolkata

a resident applicant who is directly concerned with the issue of tax deduction at source in respect of payments made to the non- resident, is specified as one of the eligible applicants

the tax payable on a long-term capital gains arisen to Moron Holdings PLC on the sale of originally acquired shares of Moron Tea Company (India) Ltd. will be @ 10% in consonance with the proviso to section 112(1) of the Act.

even in respect of sale consideration arising out of the bonus shares, the tax liability of non-resident foreign company will be @ 10% only as per the proviso to section 112(1) of the Act

AIT-2008-80-AAR
V. Ravi Narayanan Vs CIT, Chennai

NRO deposit to be made by the applicant with convertible foreign exchange in a banking company which is not a private company, shall be treated as 'foreign exchange asset' under clause (b) of Section 115C of the Act;

income by way of interest earned from the said NRO deposit shall be treated as 'investment income' under clause (c) of Section 115C and shall be liable to be taxed at the rate of twenty per cent under section 115E;

the banks paying interest on the NRO deposit of the applicant are required to deduct tax at source at the rate of twenty per cent

AIT-2008-81-AAR
Airports Authority of India Vs DIT, Delhi

The rate at which the tax has to be withheld in relation to the payments made to Raytheon company on the Software Maintenance Contract should be 10% , apart from the applicable surcharge
AIT-2008-127-AAR
M/s Harekrishna Developers Vs CST, Ahmedabad

Service Tax on Real Estate Developer-Sale agreement of residential units is subject to service tax when construction is done after booking of units

AIT-2008-128-AAR
M/s Harekrishna Developers Vs CST, Ahmedabad
Service Tax on Residential Construction
AIT-2008-150-AAR
Kern-Liebers International GmbH Vs. DIT, Bangalore

Fair market value prevailing on 1st April, 1981 ought to be taken as the cost of acquisition in the case of bonus shares held by the applicant on 1-4-1981.the applicant can claim refund under Section 139  

AIT-2008-151-AAR
WorleyParsons Services Pty. Ltd Vs. DIT, New Delhi

Receipts under the contract with GAIL are not in the nature of royalties.The income from such receipts are liable to be taxed as business profits in India and only the profits attributable to PE in  India are liable to be taxed  

AIT-2008-152-AAR
KnoWerX Education(India) Private Limited Vs. DIT, Mumbai

Applicant is not required to either deduct any income-tax or to pay any such tax on the examination fees collected by it for APICS and AST&L and remitted to them as the same is not taxable in India 

AIT-2008-180-AAR
Foster's Australia Limited Vs CIT, Pune

Income arising from the transfer of its right, title and interest in and to the trade-marks and Foster's brand Intellectual Property is taxable in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Income attributable to the grant of perpetual and irrevocable licence in relation to Brewing I.P. is not liable to be taxed   

AIT-2008-216-AAR
M/s Cushman & Wakefield (S) Pte. Ltd Vs. DIT, New Delhi

Referral fee received by Cushman & Wakefield, (S) Pte. Ltd. from Cushman & Wakefield India Pvt. Ltd., in terms of the referral agreement would not be taxable in India 

AIT-2008-236-AAR
Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd Vs. CIT, Bangalore

Amount payable under “BT Private Line Connect Service Schedule” – the agreement between the Dell US and BT America read with the Master Service Agreement is not in the nature of “fees for included services” under DTAA between India and US? 

AIT-2008-248-AAR
Airports Authority of India Vs. DIT, New Delhi

Payment received by Raytheon Company in respect of software and provision of services of installation, testing and training shall be taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with DTAA.The said payment shall be charged as royalty and fee for technical services respectively at the rate of 10 per cent as per section 115A plus applicable surcharge and cess under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

AIT-2008-260-AAR
Geoconsult ZT GmbH Vs. DIT, Mumbai

Joint Venture is an association of persons (A.O.P.) in consonance with section 2(31)(v) read with Explanation to section 2 of Act and liable to be assessed as such under Income-tax Act- J .V. is to be taxed in the status of an association of persons @ 41% net basis

AIT-2008-304-AAR
Small Business Corporation Vs DIT, Delhi
remuneration payable to the said Korean national by the Republic of Korea and/or by the India Liaison Office will not be exempt from tax in India in terms of Article 20 of the DTAA between India and the Republic of Korea
AIT-2008-320-AAR
Anapharm Inc. Vs.
Director of Income-tax

Fee paid by Sandoz Private Limited, Ranbaxy Research Laboratories to the applicant in respect of bioequivalence tests conducted by it is in the nature of 'business profits' under Article 7 of the DTAA and the same is not taxable in India

AIT-2008-321-AAR
Burmah Castrol Plc. Vs.
Director of Income-tax
tax payable on the long term capital gains arising on sale of equity shares of Foseco India Ltd, being listed securities, will be 10 per cent of the amount of capital gains
AIT-2008-337-AAR
M/s VMT Spinning Company Limited Vs CCE, Chandigarh

the construction services used for construction of workers' quarters within the factory premises, does not fall within the ambit of input services as defined in rule 2(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and consequently Applicant can not avail of the credit of such construction services in terms of rule 3 of the mentioned rules

AIT-2008-362-AAR
Golf In Dubai, L.L.C Vs. DIT, New Delhi

Income generated by GID from the Golf tournament held in Delhi and Bangalore would be not liable to tax in India in terms of Article 7 of the India-UAE DTAA?
(i) sponsorship income and a nominal management fee from Indian as well as foreign sponsors and;

(ii) income from sale of merchandise at the venue and over the internet

AIT-2008-373-AAR
Singapore Tourism Board Vs DIT, Delhi
Tourism Board is liable to pay FBT in terms of Chapter XII-H of the Act in respect of fringe benefits paid to its employees working in liaison offices in New Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai
AIT-2008-378-AAR
ISRO Satellite Centre [ISAC] Vs DIT, Bangalore
payment to M/s. Inmarsat, UK, for leasing of transponder is not Royalty having regard to the provisions of Income Tax Act and Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with UK and hence not liable to TDS u/s 195 of the Act
AIT-2008-386-AAR
LMN India Limited Vs. CIT, Delhi

The payment made to LMCC in the form of interest up to the date of conversion of bonds into equity shares is nothing other than interest paid on the money advanced to the applicant or the debt incurred by the applicant and it satisfies the definition of ‘interest’ under Section 2(28A) of the Act as well as Article 11.4 of the India-US DTAA and it is accordingly liable to be taxed as income of LMCC under the Act and under Art.11.2 of DTAA. 

AIT-2008-401-AAR
Intertek Testing Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT-X, Mumbai

Question 1. Whether on the stated facts and in law the service fee paid by the applicant to Intertek Testing Management Limited UK under Global Management Service Agreement is taxable as “Royalties & Fee for Technical Services” as per the provisions of Article 13 of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India & United Kingdom?
Question 2. Without prejudice and in alternative, if the answer to question number (i) is in negative, whether on the stated facts and in law the applicant is required to deduct tax at source on the service fee paid to Intertek Testing Management Limited, UK, at the rate of 10% plus applicable surcharge and cess as per the provisions of section 115A(1)(b)(BB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

AIT-2008-409-AAR
M/s Paradise International Vs Commissioner of Customs, Delhi
Whether the components namely Outer Shell (comprising 4 sub-parts) proposed to be imported for manufacture of Torch Light would attract Anti- Dumping Duty under Notification No.125/2003-Cus. dated 13.08.2003, wherein Anti Dumping Duty has been imposed on the Non Brass Metal Flash Light (in compact and SKD condition)?
AIT-2008-416-AAR
Burmah Castrol Plc. Vs. DIT, Mumbai

The tax payable on the long term capital gains arising on sale of equity shares of Foseco India Ltd., being listed securities, will be 10 per cent of the amount of capital gains as per the proviso to section 112(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
While calculating the amount of long term capital gain chargeable to tax interest paid by the applicant to the shareholders of Foseco India Limited as per the directives of the Securities Exchange Board of India will also be treated as a part of the cost of acquisition of the shares

AIT-2008-417-AAR
Mr. Mustaq Ahmed Vs. DIT, Chennai

The income derived by the applicant out of the purchase and export activities undertaken by him attracts charge to tax under sub-section (2) of Sec.5 of the IT Act, 1961 as the income is received in India and has accrued in India. 

 

HOME ¦ Judgment ¦ Central Excise ¦ Customs  ¦ Service Tax ¦ Income Tax ¦ VAT ¦ Finance Act ¦ Finance Bills ¦ EOU STPI ¦ SEZ ¦ DGFT ¦ RBI ¦ NTT ¦ Resources

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments